[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: kde-l10n 4 vs. 5 conflicts
From:       Burkhard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCck?= <lueck () hube-lueck ! de>
Date:       2016-07-20 14:31:12
Message-ID: 5785665.OPdnaSCL90 () tuxedo
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016, 23:39:24 CEST schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> El diumenge, 17 de juliol de 2016, a les 16:52:50 CEST, Andreas Sturmlechner
> va escriure:
> > Hello,
> 
> Burkhard since most of this is docs, any chance i can convince you to fix/
> sanitize them?
> 
Yes
> 
> > Split l10n packaging in Gentoo (divided into kdelibs4- and
> > frameworks-part)
> > gives me the opportunity to detect suspicious kde-l10n-*/4/ entries - l10n
> > for applications that have been ported at least before 16.04, and still
> > have content in the kde-l10n-*/4/ subdirectory of a kde-l10n tarball.
> > That means file collisions that need to be resolved.
> > 
> > The following is all based on 16.04.3 tarballs, always looking at the
> > kde-l10n-*/4/ subdirectory content.
> > 
> > 
> > The following list is showing conflicts with kde-l10n-*/5/ - affected
> > languages with content in these directories are appended to each line:
> > 
> > data/kdeedu/khangman nn
> > docs/applications/kate ca es et pt ru
> > docs/applications/konsole ca es et fr it pl pt ru sl sr sr@latin
> > docs/applications/kwrite ca es et fr lt pl pt ru

docs/kde-runtime is only for kde4 based system, therefore no conflict of 
khelpcenter+ glossary docbooks with kf5

> > docs/kde-runtime/glossary ca da de en_GB es fr it nl pl pt pt_BR ro ru sv
> > uk docs/kde-runtime/khelpcenter ca de es et fr he it nl pt pt_BR ru sr
> > sr@latin docs/kde-runtime/khelpcenter sv uk

> > docs/kdeedu/kig ca es et fr gl nl pl pt ru
> > docs/kdeedu/parley ca es fr gl it pl pt
> > docs/kdeedu/step ca es et fr gl hu it pt
> > docs/kdegames/bomber ca
> > docs/kdegraphics/gwenview ca es et fr gl it pl pt ru sr sr@latin zh_CN
> > docs/kdegraphics/kruler ca cs es et fr gl it pl pt ru
> > docs/kdepim ca da en_GB es et fr gl hu it lt nl pl pt ro ru sr sr@latin tr
> > uk docs/kdepimlibs ca da en_GB es et fr gl hu it nl pl pt ro ru sr
> > sr@latin
> > tr uk docs/kdesdk/kapptemplate ca es et fr pt
> > docs/kdesdk/okteta es et pt sr sr@latin
> > docs/kdeutils/kwalletmanager ca es et fr gl it pl pt ru sr sr@latin uk
> > 
> > (omitting umbrello since it can be built either way so 'lives in
> > both worlds')
> > 
> > 
> > In addition, step was kf5-based at least in 15.12 already. These files are
> > _not_ conflicting with kde-l10n-*/5/ so should be looked into, if not
> > being
> > redundant, moving them over:
> > 
> > $ find -type d -name "*step*"
> > ca/docs/kdeedu/step
> > de/data/kdeedu/step
> > es/docs/kdeedu/step
> > et/docs/kdeedu/step
> > fi/scripts/kdeedu/step_qt
> > fr/docs/kdeedu/step
> > gl/docs/kdeedu/step
> > hu/docs/kdeedu/step
> > it/data/kdeedu/step
> > it/docs/kdeedu/step
> > pt/docs/kdeedu/step
> > ru/data/kdeedu/step
> > uk/data/kdeedu/step
> > zh_CN/data/kdeedu/step
> > 
> > 
> > I hope this gives a useful overview on individual applications' conflicts.
> > It would be nice be able to clean up parts these for the upcoming
> > Applications 16.08 release already.
> > 
Thanks for the hint, will be cleaned up for 16.08

-- 
Burkhard Lück

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]