[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: simonskype.po vs. libkskype.po
From:       Frederik Schwarzer <schwarzer () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-03-05 14:00:52
Message-ID: 201203051500.52549.schwarzer () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag, 5. März 2012, 12:37:54 schrieb Peter Grasch:
> Am Montag, 5. März 2012, 00:04:48 schrieb Burkhard Lück:
> > Am Sonntag, 4. März 2012, 22:58:09 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > > El Diumenge, 4 de març de 2012, a les 22:42:42, Frederik
> > > Schwarzer va
> > > 
> > > escriure:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > playground-accessibility/libkskype.po is the same as
> > > > simonskype.po was before. Can this be merged?
> > > 
> > > I'm busy, i'll let someone else do it.
> > 
> > Afaik all messages in libskype.pot are also in simontouch.pot?
> > 
> > Peter?
> 
> This was the case once as the skype bits were basically copy &
> pasted (and slightly modified) between simonskype and simontouch.
> But since we introduced libskype, we removed the Skype parts from
> simonskype and simontouch and use the shared library instead.
> 
> Looking at the templates in trunk, the messages are picked up
> correctly:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/templates/messages/playgroun
> d- accessibility/simon-touch.pot?revision=1283429&view=markup
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/templates/messages/playgroun
> d- accessibility/simonskype.pot?revision=1279103&view=markup
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/templates/messages/playground
> - accessibility/libkskype.pot?revision=1280623&view=markup
> 
> Since the split, simonskype has only a handful of messages -
> basically just the messages for the --help argument.
> 
> So for translators, it's probably best to copy the old simonskype
> translations as libskype translations. The additional couple of
> messages shouldn't matter (and if so can easily be removed).
> I think there is also an option to add a different .po as phrase
> source in lokalize or something but I never used that.
> 
> Then again, we're talking about 32 messages...

Thanks for the clarification. Sorry, I got confused earlier.

Regards
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]