[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: RFC: To kde.pot or not to kde.pot
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2006-04-13 14:14:14
Message-ID: 200604131614.15117.nicolasg () snafu ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 13 April 2006 12:14, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dijous 13 Abril 2006 11:35, Stephan Kulow va escriure:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We currently exclude the content of kde.pot from all generated pot files.
> > The idea was to avoid duplicated translations, but it caused problems in
> > the past where it wasn't possible to overwrite certain strings in some
> > apps.
> >
> > So I'd like to know if you see the benefits of it higher than the
> > problems associated with it? Because it's easy to remove that kde.pot,
> > but it would add quite some strings to translate (to KDE4 - don't worry
> > :)
>
> For me it can go, after all kbabel has a nice "find in other translated
> files and fill in the translations in this file" option, so it's not that
> much work if we get repeated strings and solves the problems kde.pot
> causes.

But is this not the role of the compendium in kbabeldict? kde.pot was perhaps 
needed in early KDE3, when KBabel was young. But now, I suppose that such 
features should be delegated to the corresponding translation program.

>
> Albert

Have a nice day!

>
> > Greetings, Stephan
>
> ______________________________________________
> LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
> Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
> http://es.voice.yahoo.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]