[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Stats on a new basis?
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2004-02-23 10:42:23
Message-ID: 200402231142.23450.nicolasg () snafu ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 23 February 2004 00:09, Claudiu Costin wrote:
>     Dear Nicolas,
>
> On Sîm 21 Feb 2004 10:45, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > > >   Give me one example. I can't see the error. At me looks fine.
> > > > > http://i18n.kde.org/stats/gui/HEAD/de/koffice/index.php
> > > >
> > > > All kword*filter.pot files were removed, some since a few days, the
> > > > rest yesterday. But all are marked normally (for example
> > > > kwordoowriterfilter.po but its template was removed 10 days ago.)
> > >
> > >   I don't understand fully last sentence. So, you know aknowledge
> > > that's running as expected from  your P.o.V.?
> >
> > Well, no, sorry, I do not thing so.
> >
> > If a translation file (.po) has not any corresponding template (.pot)
> > anymore, should it not be marked as such? (Note 4 suggests that such a
> > file should have a blue background.)
> >
> > So as kde-i18n/templates/koffice/kwordoowriterfilter.pot does not exist
> > anymore in CVS HEAD, should not the statistic mark the files
> > kwordoowriterfilter.po? (But the German file has no blue background in
> > the statistic.)
>
> As I see on:
>   http://i18n.kde.org/stats/gui/HEAD/de/koffice/index.php
>
> 1) The GUI stats page say:
>  "last update: 2004-02-22 00:36"
>
> 2) The file "kwordoowriterfilter.po" exists in CVS:
>  
> http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/kde-i18n/de/messages/ko
>ffice/kwordoowriterfilter.po?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
>
> 3) The file "kwordoowriterfilter.pot" exists in CVS only in "Attic":
>  
> http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/%7echeckout%7e/kde-i18n/templates/
>koffice/Attic/kwordoowriterfilter.pot
>
> 4) The line with "kwordoowriterfilter.po" is marked as blue as is
> ilustrated in HTML snippet.
>

> <tr bgcolor="#e0f0ff">

Is this light blue for you? For my notebook LCD screen, it is already 
white. :-(

(...)
>
>
>    So, all is as usual. Is something I miss or I don't fully understand?
>
>
> kind regards,


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]