[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-freeqt
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Further Thoughts
From:       "Adam J. Richter" <adam () freya ! yggdrasil ! com>
Date:       1999-03-15 16:10:37
[Download RAW message or body]

Matt Gerassimoff wrote, in response to a good technical response by
Chrisof Petig:
>Boy oh boy, aren't we defensive.

Christof,

	I, for one, appreciate the technical quality of your
response, and think that, given in its brevity and need to
correct the material that it covered, it was appropriate.

>I thought this list was about harmony.
[...]
>Also, if glade-- is another wrapper, that's a good way to segment the C++
>interface.  Why do we need yet another one?  The only reason for harmony
>was for different licensing.  But it is API compatible.  Since Gtk-- has
>GPL, why do we need glade--?  Is it better?  If I write in Gtk--, does it
>work with glade--?  I guess I don't understand.

	I want to apologize for Matt's putting this lose-lose
proposition to you, where first he chastises you with "I thought
this list was about harmony" and then closes with a ton of questions
about Glade.  If you answer them, he can chastise you for an off-topic
posting, and if you do not answer them, it will look like you could
not.  I want you to know that I, and probably many others on this
list, recognize this unfair trap and won't hold either approach
against you.

	Thanks for the information about Glade as it relates to Harmony,
and, especially, thanks for writing Glade.

Adam J. Richter     __     ______________   4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
adam@yggdrasil.com     \ /                  San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630         | g g d r a s i l   United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631      "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]