[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-freeqt
Subject: Re: [freeqt] Even more Harmony with Harmony
From: Fester Zigterman <fzr () dds ! nl>
Date: 1999-02-21 12:36:59
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, you wrote:
>Clemmitt Sigler (siglercm@alphamb2.phys.vt.edu) spake thusly:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just a novice subscriber to the Harmony list, but here's my question:
>>
>> It seems to me that this is the rub with restarting Harmony. Finishing
>> the work that was started to make Harmony QT 1.4x-compliant is one thing.
>> But add to that all the additional work to bring it up to QT 2.x
>> compliance. Won't this be a problem? That's a lot of additional work.
>
> Yes it would be a problem. And by the time it was complete we'd be
>on Qt 2.1. This is one reason why I don't think there's much point in
>continuing Harmony ;)
Why not make Harmony a KDE support library?
Just implement the classes that are essential for KDE core programs.
Make KDE independent from QT, and let developers choose whether they want
their app to use a full-featured QT or just the KDE support classes, with or
without the rest of the KDE libs :) . I would think this library might be
smaller too, so some users/developers might even prefer it over QT.
I think making the KDE core independent of QT is a step in the right direction.
As for the theming stuff, i thought Harmony was already designed with theming
in mind?
Just my 2 cents :)
BYE
Fester Zigterman
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic