[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-freeqt
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Exact qt-bahaviour?
From:       Jo Dillon <emily () thelonious ! new ! ox ! ac ! uk>
Date:       1998-10-18 17:51:25
[Download RAW message or body]

I just realised that was a little unclear. I don't think it would be a
breach of compatibility, I meant :)

Jo Dillon (emily@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk) spake thusly:
> I think, on balance, not. I wonder what happens when you move outside
> of iso8859-1 locales though :) Returning Unicode or UTF-8 or even
> koi-8 might be the wrong thing to do.
> 
> Ole J. Tetlie (olet@ifi.uio.no) spake thusly:
> > *-Jo Dillon <emily@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>
> > |
> > | If it would cause KDE apps to break when compiling don't do it.
> > | If it provides extra features without breaking compatibility then feel
> > | free to do it  :)
> > 
> > Does compatibility include text strings? Would it be a breach of
> > compatibility if the string "Tor" was returned by harmony and
> > "Thu" returned by qt when an app asked for the abbreviation for
> > Thursday on a machine with LANG=no_NO?
> > 
> > -- 
> > ...Unix, MS-DOS, and MS Windows (also known as the Good, the Bad,
> > and the Ugly).                                       (Matt Welsh)
> > olet@ifi.uio.no   [-: .elOle. :-]   olet@debian.org
> 
> -- 
> 	Jo
> 
> Harmony - the project to create an LGPL Qt clone
> http://harmony.ruhr.de
> 

-- 
	Jo

Harmony - the project to create an LGPL Qt clone
http://harmony.ruhr.de

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]