[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-freeqt
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Do you want help?
From:       Olivier Galibert <galibert () pobox ! com>
Date:       1998-10-16 17:03:54
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 06:52:14PM +0200, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
> * Should the interface be identical to Qt or is a superset OK?

We implement a superset.


> * Do you (we) have a policy on whether to optimise for time or space?

In current architectures,  space is  time.   The more memory hit,  the
slower.


> * What "dialect" off C++ is most appropriate?

egcs 1.0*, including the STL (but beware of template explosion).


>   I'm asking because in
>   QDateTime there are static global functions, something that is
>   deprecated. The "modern" way is to use a namespace. Should that be
>   avoided until compilers get up to speed with it?

It should be avoided because it would not be Qt-compatible.

  OG.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]