[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-frameworks-devel
Subject: Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses
From: George Staikos <staikos () kde ! org>
Date: 2014-03-03 21:30:25
Message-ID: CAFKiAGBWQxdEZ9iurQrXtOd+ZAWJdhnFeQVFT5QMZPs+ym_wGQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
I'm ok with lgpl.
On Mar 3, 2014 4:29 PM, "=C5=A1umski" <hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote:
> > What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and
> > don't feel like digging. :)
> >
>
> Quote:
> "kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h)
> and
> kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kwalletwizard.(.cpp|.h) are
> both
> GPL-2.0+ licensed. Can you check with upstream if this is known/intended.
> If
> intended, the license should be LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2.0+ (unless the GPL-2.=
0+
> files are linked with the LGPL-2.1+ files so as that a resulting derived
> work is
> created - which should be GPL-2.0+ licensed)."
>
> Question is now, can those files be relicensed to LGPL-2.1+ ?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Hrvoje
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<p dir="ltr">I'm ok with lgpl. <br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 3, 2014 4:29 PM, "šumski" <<a \
href="mailto:hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com">hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br \
type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote:<br>
> What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and<br>
> don't feel like digging. :)<br>
><br>
<br>
Quote:<br>
"kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h) and<br>
kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kwalletwizard.(.cpp|.h) are both<br>
GPL-2.0+ licensed. Can you check with upstream if this is known/intended. If<br>
intended, the license should be LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2.0+ (unless the GPL-2.0+<br>
files are linked with the LGPL-2.1+ files so as that a resulting derived work is<br>
created - which should be GPL-2.0+ licensed)."<br>
<br>
Question is now, can those files be relicensed to LGPL-2.1+ ?<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Hrvoje</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic