--===============7754348830675445313==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dbea2e59fcc04f3ba7e81

--047d7b6dbea2e59fcc04f3ba7e81
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm ok with lgpl.
 On Mar 3, 2014 4:29 PM, "=C5=A1umski" <hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote:
> > What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and
> > don't feel like digging. :)
> >
>
> Quote:
> "kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h)
> and
> kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kwalletwizard.(.cpp|.h) are
> both
> GPL-2.0+ licensed. Can you check with upstream if this is known/intended.
> If
> intended, the license should be LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2.0+ (unless the GPL-2.=
0+
> files are linked with the LGPL-2.1+ files so as that a resulting derived
> work is
> created - which should be GPL-2.0+ licensed)."
>
> Question is now, can those files be relicensed to LGPL-2.1+ ?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Hrvoje

--047d7b6dbea2e59fcc04f3ba7e81
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I&#39;m ok with lgpl. <br>
</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mar 3, 2014 4:29 PM, &quot;=C5=A1umski&quot; =
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com">hrvoje.senjan@gmail.com</a>&=
gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote:<br>
&gt; What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven&#39;t read the back inf=
o and<br>
&gt; don&#39;t feel like digging. :)<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
Quote:<br>
&quot;kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp=
|h) and<br>
kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kwalletwizard.(.cpp|.h) are b=
oth<br>
GPL-2.0+ licensed. Can you check with upstream if this is known/intended. I=
f<br>
intended, the license should be LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2.0+ (unless the GPL-2.0+=
<br>
files are linked with the LGPL-2.1+ files so as that a resulting derived wo=
rk is<br>
created - which should be GPL-2.0+ licensed).&quot;<br>
<br>
Question is now, can those files be relicensed to LGPL-2.1+ ?<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Hrvoje</blockquote></div>

--047d7b6dbea2e59fcc04f3ba7e81--

--===============7754348830675445313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

--===============7754348830675445313==--