[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-extra-gear
Subject:    Re: [Kde-extra-gear] Rethinking position on trunk x branches
From:       Helio Chissini de Castro <helio () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-03-08 14:11:48
Message-ID: 200703081111.49083.helio () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Em Qui 08 Mar 2007, Angelo Naselli escreveu:
> As asked, I'm back on this subject following the old thread.
> As far as I'm concerned I don't mind to branch keg either for kde4
> or for kde3 svn should be easy to use to manage for that.
> But I believe the way to is to branch all the keg.

Right, fully agree

> If someone cannot work on kde4 yet can disable his/her application
> to be built. AFAIK kde-i18n is breanching (or has already) so why
> not following their example? If they've chosen to stay in trunk for
> stable we can do that either.

Agree too, but my preference is kde4 in trunk and branch all kde3

I have some proposition that give us time to prepare, which is set the day of 
branching exactly the day of kdelibs 4 API freeze. As current state of 
people's work, it's near, right ?

Otherwise, we can set branch for soon as next weekend.


> As I told you in mine first, It seems silly to me branching every
> single keg application.

True, and branch all keg it is.

-- 
Helio Chissini de Castro
KDE Project South America Primary Contact
Curitiba - Brasil
_______________________________________________
Kde-extra-gear mailing list
Kde-extra-gear@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-extra-gear
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]