From kde-extra-gear Thu Mar 08 14:11:48 2007 From: Helio Chissini de Castro Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:11:48 +0000 To: kde-extra-gear Subject: Re: [Kde-extra-gear] Rethinking position on trunk x branches Message-Id: <200703081111.49083.helio () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-extra-gear&m=117336314903280 Em Qui 08 Mar 2007, Angelo Naselli escreveu: > As asked, I'm back on this subject following the old thread. > As far as I'm concerned I don't mind to branch keg either for kde4 > or for kde3 svn should be easy to use to manage for that. > But I believe the way to is to branch all the keg. Right, fully agree > If someone cannot work on kde4 yet can disable his/her application > to be built. AFAIK kde-i18n is breanching (or has already) so why > not following their example? If they've chosen to stay in trunk for > stable we can do that either. Agree too, but my preference is kde4 in trunk and branch all kde3 I have some proposition that give us time to prepare, which is set the day of branching exactly the day of kdelibs 4 API freeze. As current state of people's work, it's near, right ? Otherwise, we can set branch for soon as next weekend. > As I told you in mine first, It seems silly to me branching every > single keg application. True, and branch all keg it is. -- Helio Chissini de Castro KDE Project South America Primary Contact Curitiba - Brasil _______________________________________________ Kde-extra-gear mailing list Kde-extra-gear@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-extra-gear