[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-edu-devel
Subject:    Re: [kde-edu-devel] kverbos
From:       Matthias Messmer <bmlmessmer () web ! de>
Date:       2002-07-28 16:21:06
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 28 July 2002 17:59, Klas Kalass wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 06:17 schrieb Arnold Kraschinski:
> > Hello,
> >
> > first of all it isn't important for me that KVerbos is part of the KDE
> > distribution. I wrote the program for myself to train the Spanish verbs
> > and this is still the main purpose. I found the KDE-EDU group only by
> > chance. So feel free to remove it.
>
> OK, so I think we should remove it from the edu module - but feel free to
> put it into the extra gear if you would like to keep it in KDE Project.
> Just ask someone with enough karma to move your app serverside and
> subscribe to the mailinglist. Else please remove it from edu yourself, as
> it is your app :)
>
> Reminder: All apps in the extra gear are supposed to be stable or
> near-stable and are expected to be *actively* maintained.
>
> Greetings,
> Klas

Why dont you answer to the later statements of Arnold?

1. Most Voctrainers - so ours - have the problem that there are no voc data to 
train with. KVerbos generates lots of data by itself.

2. Furthermore there are lots of discussion about the usability/GUI of 
KVocTrain. So in my oppinion it is not yet an alternative. 

3. If we empasise voc training we will lose language specific gramar sections. 
KLatin tries to work on that, KVerbos does, too. 

Conclusion:
Since we dont have a general "KLanguage" application featuring plugins for 
several language specific training sections we should not bann tiny projects 
like Kverbos from kdeedu, imho.

Regards

Matthias
>
> > > You're right and that's exactly the point. Many developers don't know
> >
> > about
> >
> > > the abilities of other programs even about those in the same module.
> > > KVoctrain could easily replace kverbos. It is even almost the same.
> >
> > The difference between a vocabulary trainer and KVerbos is that KVerbos
> > creates the forms itself in a vocabulary trainer you have to enter it.
> > That means you have to enter about 120 forms for all times, for gerund
> > forms and for perfect forms with the verb in a vocabulary trainer. That's
> > the reason why I think a vocabulary trainer isn't usefull for this task,
> > why I started the project, why I will use KVerbos and why in my opinion
> > you can wipe out 'easily'.
> >
> > Arnold
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-edu-devel mailing list
> > kde-edu-devel@mail.kde.org
> > http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu-devel mailing list
> kde-edu-devel@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu-devel

-- 
Matthias Messmer
Germany
_______________________________________________
kde-edu-devel mailing list
kde-edu-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic