[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: branch for kdevelop
From:       Roland Krause <rokrau () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2001-08-07 22:20:43
[Download RAW message or body]

Waldo,

--- Waldo Bastian <bastian@kde.org> wrote:
> 
> Feel free to make a new branch but what about GIDEON then? 

I did try that but failed due to isufficient write permissions to
/home/kde, maybe my cvs settings are wrong. 

> I thought
> GIDEON 
> was supposed to be part of KDE 3.0? 

Afaik, this is still the case. Unfortunately, the group of developers
has split into two fractions. A few people, including me, have decided
to integrate kate as the text editor into the current codebase. Ralf
agreed that this could be released as KDevelop-2.2 in time with
KDE-2.2.1. 

> If you are now talking about
> KDevelop 2.1 
> I'm getting this strong feeling that gideon will never be released
> and die an 
> untimely death. 

I do not think so. 

> You might want to reconsider your priorities. 

No, you dont know what the priorities of the contributing fractions
are. For example, my priority, to have a functional IDE, that best
suits my needs is currently best accomplished by improving
KDevelop-2.0. 

> And why
> can't 
> you continue to use the KDEVELOP_1_4 branch? Just because of the
> name?

I agree, we could, Ralf thinks it is very confusing to use KDEVEOP_1_4
for new developers, that's why I asked. The more I think about it, the
more I agree with you to leave the name as it is.

Thanks for your input,
Roland
> 
> Cheers,
> Waldo
> -- 
> KDE 2.2: We deliver.

=====
--
Roland Krause
In the garage of life there are mechanics and 
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]