[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: qt-copy or qt-2.3.0?
From:       Daniel Molkentin <molkentin () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-04-16 12:10:01
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag 16 April 2001 13:39 schrieb dep:
> morning!
>
> i hate to be a pain with these questions, and i've looked in the
> archives but haven't found an answer.
>
> if one were doing a clean build of the head branch, which would be
> preferable -- qt-2.3.0 as released by the trolls, or the current
> qt-copy? i noticed that there *do* seem to be some differences.
>
> if one is preferred, is it required?

KDE CVS can be compiled with either Qt 2.2.4 or Qt 2.3.
The latter enables KDE to use antialiased fonts. qt-copy is Qt 2.3 +
some changes backported from Trolltechs internal CVS. 
I personally use qt-copy and it works just fine. So:

Required: 2.2.4
Preferred: 2.3 or qt-copy

</daniel>

-- 
KDE 2.1 - Conquer your Desktop!
http://www.kde.org
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]