[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Question for Kmail developers
From:       Roberto Alsina <ralsina () conectiva ! com ! ar>
Date:       2001-01-29 16:06:00
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Daniel Karlsson wrote:

> On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:19, Michael H=E4ckel wrote:
> > If you saw off a branch of a real tree, then the branch also falls to
> > the ground and doesn't remain on the tree. I consider that behavior
> > correct. The rest of the mails simply doesn't contain the required
> > information any more. It seems that Netscape does threading according
> > to the subject and only groups the mails together. KMail does threading
> > according to the message id and can display the real tree, how the
> > replies belong to each other.

What I see often done is this:

Do real threading. Then group by subject of the "root" of the thread. Sort
within the group by date of sending.

That gives a better threading than strict threading, IMHO :-)

 ("\''/").__..-''"`-. .         Roberto Alsina
 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ralsina@conectiva.com.ar
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   Director t=E9cnico
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'           Conectiva SA
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'             Buenos Aires - Argentina
                                KDE Developer (MFCH)
Futuaris nisi irrisus ridebis. (Carlton, De rerum comoedia)

 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]