[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: RE: XPM/Ksgml
From: David Faure <David.Faure () cramersystems ! com>
Date: 2000-03-22 16:21:15
[Download RAW message or body]
> i feel these should be put into the kdesupport package for
> completeness Ksgml taken from kdesdk to kdesupport will stop the current
> situation in that kdelibs wont build till kdesdk is installed and
> kdesdk wont build without kdelibs
ksgmltools is developed by KDE developers, therefore it should be
in kdelibs. kdesupport is for 3rd party libraries - jade could
be put there to make it easier.
xpm too but KDE builds fine without it, so it's probably not worth
the hassle.
> but definatly kmatrix [i use it myself] should be kept in but
> not built if XPM is not avail as with the GL savers that arnt built
> without GL libs.
Done already.
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Stephan Kulow wrote:
>
> > David Faure wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > > The addition of the Matrix screen saver seems to break kdelibs:
> > > > matrix.o: In function `KMatrixSaver::load_images(void)':
> > > > matrix.o(.text+0xb05): undefined reference to
> > > > `XpmCreatePixmapFromData'
> > >
> > > Note that this is kdebase, not kdelibs ;-) (nitpicking).
> > >
> > > Is the kmatrix author listening ? I think we need a decision here,
> > > between
> > >
> > > * porting kmatrix so that it doesn't need the xpm library
> > > * adding libxpm to kdesupport (huh:()
> > > * disabling kmatrix compilation if xpm isn't available (hmmm:()
> > > * removing kmatrix and letting people install it as part
> of xscreensaver
> > >
> > 3 or 4 - note that there are other kscreensavers that are
> disabled on
> > xpm missing as well.
> >
> > Greetings, Stephan
> >
> > --
> > Programmers, heed this: If someone starts asking you about
> > agricultural genomes, it's likely time to get a handler.
> > zdnet.com about Torvalds
> >
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic