[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    LSB and large projects
From:       Mark Deneen <deneen () bucknell ! edu>
Date:       2000-03-09 2:53:08
[Download RAW message or body]

It can't hurt to talk to the LSB.  The only problem with allowing stuff like
that to happen is choosing how to decide what is and is not allowed to do that.

For example, when mozilla is completed, is it "worthy" of being in /usr/mozilla?

Who decides?

I'm Cc'ing a copy of this letter to the lsb as well.

Dennis -- Have you guys talked about things like this before?  What was the
consensus?


On 09-Mar-00 dep wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> 
>| Personally, I'd probably introduce /usr/kde and /usr/gnome (much
>| like /usr/X11R6) - but FSSTND doesn't permit this, so /usr is the
>| only compliant way to go.
> 
> when a standard is afu, it's time to change the standard. and this 
> one is afu.
> 
> -- 
> dep
> --
> take back america and throw a wobble into the spin:
> if you're interviewed by an election exit pollster, lie!

--
Mark Deneen
http://tick.dhs.org ICQ: 333068

You can tell the ideals of a nation by its advertisements.
                -- Norman Douglas

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]