[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: kdvi/kpathsea hack doesn't work for me
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       1999-11-11 13:19:51
[Download RAW message or body]

Duncan Haldane wrote:
> 
> On 11-Nov-99 Alexander Feigl wrote:
> > At Don, 11 Nov 1999 Duncan Haldane wrote:
> >> On 11-Nov-99 Mosfet wrote:
> >> > Have you looked at it's configure? ;-)
> 
> <snip>
> >> >> Works, but this solution is not very "good". It seems that the second
> >> >> "configure" in kpathsea. At the secord run the kpathsea gets mixed with the top
> >> >> level configure and that seems to be the only reason why this works - strange.
> >> >> Would it be better to integrate kpathsea config into main config?
> >>
> >> Hi, I guess from this thread that someone has updated the kpathsea in kde-2.
> >> (I havent managed to build kde-2 recently, but....)
> >>
> >> I was the person who updated the kpathsea in KDE-1.1.x cvs this july, as
> >> kdvi was broken with glibc-2.1 in RedHat 6.0 with the old kpathsea.
> >>
> >
> > AFAIK KDE-1.1.x does not have THIS problem. We have problems with "sideeffects"
> > of am_edit - and KDE-1.1.x does not have am_edit , does it?
> >
> 
> Oh-Oh - I see I just checked the kde-2 sources,   You HAVENT updated
> kpathsea....  This *is*  bad news.   Unless (until?) Markku Hihnala delivers

Is there a single good reason why YOU left the old sources in there
while
touching KDE 1.1.2? 

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.  
                       By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]