[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: kdvi/kpathsea hack doesn't work for me
From:       Alexander Feigl <Alexander.Feigl () gmx ! de>
Date:       1999-11-11 5:12:13
[Download RAW message or body]

At Don, 11 Nov 1999 Mosfet wrote:

Yes, I've seen it will be a little bit tricky. :) We might have to change some
part of kpathsea too.

There must be any solution because we cannot tell the users : "Please cd to
kpathsea, do "make clean" and "make" then go back" But how can we avoid am_edit
messing around? Add some "magic" tag in Makefile.am that leaves Makefile.in
untouched by am_edit?  We don't need am_edit for kpathsea. Do we?

> Have you looked at it's configure? ;-)
> 
> Alexander Feigl wrote:
> > 
> > At Mit, 10 Nov 1999 Mosfet wrote:
> > > Alexander Feigl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > It seems like the kpathsea "hack" applied recently doesn't work for me. I get an
> > > > empty libkpathsea - with unsesolved symbols as a result. It seems like we
> > > > really have to fix am_edit and not adding dummy files.
> > >
> > > Yes, it is a huge hack right now. Try cd'ing into the kdvi/kpathsea
> > > directory, doing make clean; make, then cd'ing back up to kdvi and
> > > making again.
> > >
> > 
> > Works, but this solution is not very "good". It seems that the second
> > "configure" in kpathsea. At the secord run the kpathsea gets mixed with the top
> > level configure and that seems to be the only reason why this works - strange.
> > Would it be better to integrate kpathsea config into main config?
> > 
> > Greetings
> > 
> > Alexander
> 
> -- 
> Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
> mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
> mosfet@kde.org
> mosfet@jorsm.com
-- 
Alexander Feigl       E-Mail   : Alexander.Feigl@gmx.de
Burachstraße 51       Homepage : http://www.moondream.de

D-88250 Weingarten

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]