[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Is there a need vor a FREE isdn4linux frontend for KDE?
From:       Alexander Feigl <Alexander.Feigl () gmx ! de>
Date:       1999-08-31 18:43:50
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Die, 31 Aug 1999 schrieb Jo Dillon:
> Alexander Feigl (Alexander.Feigl@gmx.de) spake thusly:
> > Am Die, 31 Aug 1999 schrieb Jo Dillon:
> > > Alexander Feigl (Alexander.Feigl@gmx.de) spake thusly:
> > > > it ? konnekt ? ) doesn't look into the sources. We would have to develop
> > > > something quite independent. And I think we could do it even better. And we
> > > > certainly don't want to have a second Harmony Project.
> > > 
> > >   What do you mean by this, exactly? :)
> > 
> > Don't remember Harmoy (QT clone)? It died in progress . Mainly because the
> > Trolls changed the license to QPL. I'm quite happy with QPL but I would be
> > real
> > happy if there would be something GPLized.  And it (ISDN app) shouldn't be an
> > exact copy otherwise those milleniumx guys say I have copied their code
> 
>   Of course I remember it, I co-ran the project! ;) Fair enough; I was
> just curious what you meant by a 'second harmony project' - a threat
> of being sued, a failed project or whatever.
> 

Ooops! :) Being sued? Bye whom ? I just don't want a second clone of a
"not-so-free" original that dies. (the reasons may be sueing or anything else)
Ok, kisdn license is much more restrictive so you cannot really compare
Qt/Harmony with kisdn/***** 

Alexander 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]