[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Next release called 1.2?
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () caldera ! de>
Date:       1999-08-24 15:28:18
[Download RAW message or body]

Troy Engel wrote:
> 
> Andreas Krogh wrote:
> >
> > I think KDevelop, KDbg + the hi-color icons just isn't enough for the
> > desktop-user(remember, we have now a _LOT_ of KDE/Linux users who are
> > not programmers), and adds no new functionallity to the avarage user.
> > Hense kde-1.1.2 and not 1.2.
> 
> Ahh, but that's where it starts.  Get kdevelop and kdbg into the hands
> on non-programmers, and you'll find that 20-30% of those turn out to be
> interested (given that kdevelop makes things so easy to get started) and
> we end up having more apps for the desktop.  Especially since folks
> nowadays are including their kdevelop-workspace files in the tarballs,
> it's trivial to fire up kdevelop against some source and help fix bugs.
> 
> In the theory of version numbering (I'm a CM guy in Real Life(tm) - not
> that I'm any goo, but I do it <g>) it's major.minor.bugfix.build for
> most things.  KDE 1.1.1 was, IMO, misappropriately labeled as a bugfix
> since it was much more than that.  KDE 1.2 is a more appropriate release
What was it more than that? ktop comes in my mind, nothing more

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
Better give your hours some more life than
your life some more hours. - anonymous

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]