[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: LinuxWorld Award and KDE-2.0
From:       Matthias Ettrich <ettrich () troll ! no>
Date:       1999-07-29 22:01:56
[Download RAW message or body]

Can somebody who is working on the mentioned classes please comment on that? 
I mean, maybe me and Reginal are just too stupid to type urls, but these
basic things look pretty broken, and I honestly doubt that they worked for
anybody when they have been commited.

Basically, it's a bad idea to check a kconfig in that doesn't even load config
files, or a URL class that can't parse http://www.kde.org. Just stating "these
things work for lots of people" doesn't really help us writing software based
on the kde libraries.

Matthias


On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Reginald Stadlbauer wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Mosfet wrote:
> >Things do work for a lot of people. I have had no problems with kded, kpanel,
> >or konq. If there are problems we really do need more information to fix them
> 
> KConfig:
> 
> When saving configs checkAccess (or how this function is called) always
> returns FALSE, which means KConfig doesn't save. If I remove the checkAccess
> calls it at least saves configs. For reading configs, I'll look at this closer
> tonight.
> 
> kded:
> 
> If I start kded and don't remove ~/.kde/share/config/kregistry before I get lots
> of debug output like
> 
> kiolib (KRegistry): Oooops
> 
> and then
> 
> Aborted                                                                       
> 
> In konqy I get "Unknown protocol "file"" if I e.g. enter "file:/usr" or so. And
> malformed URL for e.g. "http://www.kde.org". And yes, I have installed all
> protocols and so on.
> 
> Need more infos?
> 
> --
> Reggie

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]