[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: suffix stuff argument for the idl compiler in am_edit
From:       Simon Hausmann <tronical () gmx ! net>
Date:       1999-06-09 21:04:38
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, David Faure wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Hi (Stephan :),
> > 
> > I just switched to new mico 2.2.7 and noticed that the two options
> > --c++-suffix and --h-suffix (which are both added by am_edit) 
> > "disappeared" from the list of supported aruments of 2.2.7's idl compiler,
> > thus breaking compilation.
> > 
> (about telling them) :
> 
> The ChangeLog tells that --h-suffix has been removed because the C backend
> has been removed. Are you sure the --c++-suffix has been removed as well ?
> It might be that it hasn't but that using both broke compilation
> so you didn't test only one, did you ?
> In that case there's nothing for me to ask them : c++ files have varying suffixes
> but .h is pretty common, at least in KDE.

Oh!
Shame on me ;-) , you're 100% right. I should really read the ChangeLog
more carefully next time.

In fact I just saw that the idl compiler fails because of some option and
I just removed both, to be safe ;-) . I checked the idl-compiler source
now and saw that you're right.

Thanks for pointing this out!
  Simon

--
Simon Hausmann       <hausmann@kde.org>
http://www.kde.org/  <tronical@gmx.net>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]