[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: MICO 2.2.6
From:       David Faure <faure () alpha ! tat ! physik ! uni-tuebingen ! de>
Date:       1999-04-29 10:47:29
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 12:36:47PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Steffen Hansen wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I tried to compile kdelibs using the latest mico 2.2.6, but
> > > I had one strange effect. the idl doesn't create a
> > > operator<<= for KOM::Member and I have no idea why. So
> > > I added one myself into the idl output and it compiled fine.
> > >
> > > Now I'm lost a bit if this is a bug in the idl or something
> > > I did wrong.
> > >
> > > The added operator looks like:
> > > CORBA::Boolean operator<<=( CORBA::Any &_a, const KOM::Member &_s )
> > > {
> > >   CORBA::StaticAny _sa (_marshaller_KOM_Member, &_s);
> > >   return _a.from_static_any (_sa);
> > > }
> > >
> > 
> > You must do "idl -any" to generate code that supports CORBA::Any.
> > 
> Now I see the pattern. Thanks. But now I get a compilation error
> in partsui where egcs claims that certain abstract functions weren't 
> implemented in OPToolbarIf, but I can't see the difference between
> the declarations ;(

AFAIK, Torben and Simon managed to compile kde with mico-2.2.6
Perhaps we should ask them to commit, and all switch to 2.2.6 ?

-- 
David FAURE
david.faure@insa-lyon.fr, faure@kde.org
http://www.insa-lyon.fr/People/AEDI/dfaure/index.html 
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]