[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: MICO 2.2.6
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () itm ! mu-luebeck ! de>
Date:       1999-04-29 10:36:47
[Download RAW message or body]

Steffen Hansen wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > I tried to compile kdelibs using the latest mico 2.2.6, but
> > I had one strange effect. the idl doesn't create a
> > operator<<= for KOM::Member and I have no idea why. So
> > I added one myself into the idl output and it compiled fine.
> >
> > Now I'm lost a bit if this is a bug in the idl or something
> > I did wrong.
> >
> > The added operator looks like:
> > CORBA::Boolean operator<<=( CORBA::Any &_a, const KOM::Member &_s )
> > {
> >   CORBA::StaticAny _sa (_marshaller_KOM_Member, &_s);
> >   return _a.from_static_any (_sa);
> > }
> >
> 
> You must do "idl -any" to generate code that supports CORBA::Any.
> 
Now I see the pattern. Thanks. But now I get a compilation error
in partsui where egcs claims that certain abstract functions weren't 
implemented in OPToolbarIf, but I can't see the difference between
the declarations ;(

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.  
                       By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic