[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: MICO 2.2.6
From: Stephan Kulow <coolo () itm ! mu-luebeck ! de>
Date: 1999-04-29 10:36:47
[Download RAW message or body]
Steffen Hansen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Stephan Kulow wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I tried to compile kdelibs using the latest mico 2.2.6, but
> > I had one strange effect. the idl doesn't create a
> > operator<<= for KOM::Member and I have no idea why. So
> > I added one myself into the idl output and it compiled fine.
> >
> > Now I'm lost a bit if this is a bug in the idl or something
> > I did wrong.
> >
> > The added operator looks like:
> > CORBA::Boolean operator<<=( CORBA::Any &_a, const KOM::Member &_s )
> > {
> > CORBA::StaticAny _sa (_marshaller_KOM_Member, &_s);
> > return _a.from_static_any (_sa);
> > }
> >
>
> You must do "idl -any" to generate code that supports CORBA::Any.
>
Now I see the pattern. Thanks. But now I get a compilation error
in partsui where egcs claims that certain abstract functions weren't
implemented in OPToolbarIf, but I can't see the difference between
the declarations ;(
Greetings, Stephan
--
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.
By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic