[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: ksycoca4
From: Ian Wadham <iandw.au () gmail ! com>
Date: 2014-03-22 22:41:05
Message-ID: CFDE250A-2056-47BD-B21C-F65A4A69F747 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 23/03/2014, at 4:52 AM, mk-lists@email.de wrote:
> I just tried to start KDE's bug reporter from a little tutorial applicati=
on on MacOSX, but I got this spat out at the console: =
> =97
> $ tutorial2.app/Contents/MacOS/tutorial2
> tutorial2(1006)/kdecore (KSycoca) KSycocaPrivate::openDatabase: Trying to=
open ksycoca from "/private/var/tmp/kdecache-marko/ksycoca4=94
That is a normal message. It just tells you where KDE libs is looking for t=
he SyCoCa.
I see you are running your tutorial2 as if it was a UNIX or Linux app, i.e.=
by
direct execution of the executable file which the compile/build just create=
d. That
is OK most of the time. I do it routinely when building/testing KDE games.
However, as I discovered only a few days ago, if KDE libs has to start anot=
her
process, such as a plugin or maybe the bug reporter, you can fall foul of A=
pple
OS X execution conventions --- or rather their absence. See the thread
"taskgated: no signature" on the MacPorts Users list for the (slow) dawning=
of
my understanding of this.
Briefly, if you do "make install" with your test program, KDE's CMake-gener=
ated
makefile will create an Apple OS X app "bundle" at /Applications/KDE4/tutor=
ial2.app,
which you can then execute in the proper Apple OS X way with:
open /Applications/KDE4/tutorial2.app
and all your special test-environment variables will also be effective.
You might then find that your test works: my Palapeli plugin certainly did =
for
me, but it had always crashed Palapeli before when testing UNIX/Linux-style,
because although the plugin was found, it could not be loaded by the O/S.
The drawback of using "open" to run the app is that your app's debugging ou=
tput
goes to the Apple OS X Console log, rather than stderr.
For KDE bystanders: Apple OS X installs apps as "bundles" --- a tree of
directories and files, starting at <prefix>/<appname>.app --- and that tree
contains all the info the app needs to run, not just the executables. I am
about to dive into the following link (when I have time):
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/CoreFoundation/Co=
nceptual/CFBundles/Introduction/Introduction.html
As I said to Frank a while back, "They just do things differently in that t=
own".
> =97
> and nothing happened.
> =
> I don=92t know what goes wrong here.
> Perhaps nothing?
Try again? =85 :-)
Cheers, Ian W.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscrib=
e <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic