[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: How should the version field in BTS be used?
From: Michael Leupold <lemma () confuego ! org>
Date: 2008-09-24 23:07:51
Message-ID: 200809250107.51804.lemma () confuego ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I was under the impression that when you are able to reproduce a bug
> in a newer version, you should, if possible, bump the version of the
> component it was filed against.
> As a few of my changes have just been reverted, I wanted to check
> if I am correct or mistaken.
> Personally, I think my way makes more sense as it helps to prevent
> bug rot. On the other hand, I do not want to go against established
> procedures, either.
As far as I know, different components handle it differently. From bugsquad's
point of view it would make sense to make the semantics the same for all of
them - this would make it easier for us and other developers to understand
what's going on.
We do however understand that different developers/teams have different ways
of handling the version field and we respect that. I do hope that the new
Bugzilla (and custom fields) could help this situation by making the version
field say the same KDE-wide and introducing/using extra-fields to express the
different semantics needed by different products.
Bugsquad's preferred meaning of the version field:
- for open bugs: The version this bug was last tested/reproduced on
- for closed bugs: The last version this bug could be reproduced on
Other possible meanings of the version field:
- target release
- the version this bug was reported on
No objection to picking another meaning as "default" - still having it the
same would be nice.
Regards,
Michael
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic