[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Raptor=Dolphin?
From:       Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-07-02 8:19:42
Message-ID: 200807020419.42958.lightsolphoenix () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On June 30, 2008 10:10:18 am Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2008, Kelly Miller wrote:
> > On June 29, 2008 8:20:27 am Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > Hi, Peter.  There was the possibility that raptor had been renamed, for
> > > any reason, and I needed to rule that out.  I propose to say that it is
> > > being developed as a third option, together with Dolphin and Classic. 
> > > I haven't come across Lancelot :-) so maybe I should look that up too.
> >
> > I'm also working on one called PhoenixMenu (though I'm open to, uh,
> > better names), which I'm basing on TastyMenu from KDE3... at least, when
> > I'm not being a lazy coward...
>
> cool; are you working on this in kde's svn? if so, when/if it's ready to be
> used by mere mortals, it could find a home in kdeplasmoids if you'd like.

I was thinking about asking, but was waffling between "I won't get in" and 
"KDE has too many menus already".

> oh, cool :)
> i always thinked about resurrecting it, but waaay too lazy :D
> put in in playground, it would be nice, really:)
> oh, little advice: don't try too hard on porting code from the kde3 tasty
> menu, that it's a bit ehm, terrible:) and way too dependent from kde3.
> i think a way better start is kickoff, i think a tastymenu look and feel
> can be obtained only by changing one single file, leaving all the rest
> absolutely unchanged
>
> Cheers,
> Marco Martin

The original code is handy for getting a good feel for the structure, though.  
I didn't think I'd be able to use any of the original code directly, since I 
know there are differences there.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]