[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: (was "Open question...)
From:       FiNeX <finex () finex ! org>
Date:       2008-06-28 8:20:00
Message-ID: 200806281020.00399.finex () finex ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Il 28/6/2008 alle 00:01, ha scritto:
> 2008/6/27 AnneWilson <cannewilson@googlemail.com>:
> > On Friday 27 June 2008 11:02:31 FiNeX wrote:
> > > 27/6/2008 - 08:38, AnneWilson wrote:
> > > > There's absolutely no point in duplicating effort, so the solution
> >
> > would
> >
> > > > be for those of us interested to be one team, with one wiki project.
> > >
> > > I'm not really sure if the wiki structure is good. You need some people
> > > which gather informations from multiple points:
> > > - changelog: for what has already done
> > > - ?????: for what has been planned
>
> I guess we could use the information on the changelog and the TODO pages.
> At least KGet gives the proper informations. I guess other proyects/apps do
> the same
> Please check this links on the KGet WebSVN
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/kget/Changelog?view=markup
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdenetwork/kget/TODO?view=markup

This is good.

What I mean is that all devs should adopt the same system, the one all devs 
prefer. Using a common way to mark the changelog and the TODO (maybe 
specifying the version) will help an automated system used for gather 
informations.

-- 
by FiNeX
http://www.finex.org
finex (@) finex (.) org
Linux Registered User #306523

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]