[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: fsync() madness
From:       "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-04-21 16:01:35
Message-ID: e2e108260804210901u2cc59c66obe4729ec571032e4 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Sunday 20 of April 2008, Sami Liedes wrote:
>  > I had missed that post. Still, no analysis of the performance hit
>  > there, and I think the attitude of "no data loss at all allowed at any
>  > power loss, implement at any cost to performance" is misguided.
>
>   Tell that to XFS developers and their users. Anyway, where's your patch?

Before discussing patches, we should agree which functionality to
change. Is it considered acceptable to change the behavior of
KTempFile, or should only the behavior of Konqueror's history saving
be changed ?

Bart.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]