[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: fsync() madness
From:       Gary Greene <greeneg () tolharadys ! net>
Date:       2008-04-21 15:25:47
Message-ID: 200804210825.56933.greeneg () tolharadys ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 21 April 2008 8:15:51 am Sami Liedes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:11:40PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 of April 2008, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > > I had missed that post. Still, no analysis of the performance hit
> > > there, and I think the attitude of "no data loss at all allowed at any
> > > power loss, implement at any cost to performance" is misguided.
> >
> >  Tell that to XFS developers and their users. Anyway, where's your patch?
>
> The patch is simple and not very fine grained, but effective and
> shouldn't break anything unless a power loss happens. Attached.
>
> 	Sami

Again you are not taking into account XFS. How many times must we iterate over 
this.... _If you don't have the code check which FS this is on and PROPERLY 
deal with this, you will kill users data._

-- 
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sent from: peorth.tolharadys.net
 08:24:18 up 11 days, 12:34,  1 user,  load average: 0.22, 0.07, 0.10
==========================================================================
Developer and Project Lead for the AltimatOS open source project
Volunteer Developer for the KDE open source project
See http://www.altimatos.com/ and http://www.kde.org/ for more information
==========================================================================

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]