[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug 8333
From:       Stephen Leaf <smileaf () smileaf ! org>
Date:       2007-08-09 13:08:51
Message-ID: 200708090808.51285.smileaf () smileaf ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 09 August 2007 05:16:40 James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> > but cluttering up the toolbar isn't good either.
>
> As someone with a lot of toolbars and icons, I really can't comment on
> that. :-)
nice and pretty. :)
http://images.smileaf.org/img:6c9ba9b548a766835128145ed46bdcef

> > IMO if I'm using file konqy it just makes sense that home goes to my
> > home dir. and web konqy that it goes to [whatever website here] So if
> > that were the case I'd personally prefer even if we used the drop
> > down button, that it's default action would be set to that protocol's
> > home. of course an appropriate icon to visually separate the 2 is in
> > order.
>
> The problem is that there really aren't two Kongys -- KDE currently
> provides the illusion that there are two, but they are really just the
> same with different configurations.
Yes, but users don't see it this way. They think when they browse their 
filesystem it should look and behave like a file browser and not like a web 
browser. In fact I think there is another bug(s) concerning this.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119052
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33460
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56730

> > I like the idea of a more proper protocol config, but I still like
> > the existing view profile idea. For instance remove the view profile
> > in favor of what you were saying, but make it possible to create a
> > custom view and save that. So the view profiles would still exist,
> > but a bit more integrated/intelligent for the 2 major protocols (file
> > and http)
>
> My idea was to separate the configuration of Konqueror and the URLs
> displayed into two different functions.  There are probably several ways
> of doing this that would be satisfactory.  Having Konqueror
> automatically choose the configuration based on the protocol use seems
> the most intuitive.  But, perhaps it should also be possible to manually
> add additional configurations.
Seems like we are on the same page then.
the view profile as I was describing wasn't really for the home url. just the 
tabs/splits and the urls assigned to them. like how it currently is really.
the only thing that would really change is we add a protocol home url 
accompanied by a drop down home button to house all of them. (the button is 
an apartment, ha ha... )
for configuration change we add a spot for Web Home URL.
For the 2 protocol profiles these would serve as the location konqy will start 
with.
-- 
Stephen Leaf
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]