[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: konqueror has 1305 unconfirmed bugs
From:       Philip Rodrigues <philip.rodrigues () chch ! ox ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2006-08-23 22:20:33
Message-ID: ecikaa$4rv$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Dirk Stoecker wrote:

 
> I have holidays at the moment and did have a look in bugs.kde.org. First
> fixing 3 of the bugs I was annoyed with I started to look a bit into
> konqueror. It has 2293 bugs, 1305 of these are unconfirmed.
> 
> 
http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?product=konqueror&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_severity= \
critical&bug_severity=grave&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=crash&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor

> 
> I used the link above and started to randomly pick bugs which I thought I
> either may confirm to be valid or close.
> 
> Well there are many duplicates, outdated stuff and so on.
> 
> So a suggestion from my side would be to reduce the number of unconfirmed
> bugs a lot. konqueror is one of the main components of KDE and it should
> not have such a bad status. At least all confirmable bugs should get the
> status NEW and all the others should be closed after a while when they
> stay unconfirmable.

It seems like there's enough interest that maybe it would be worth having
a "konqueror bug cleanup day" or something - basically just gather
somewhere on IRC and have one or two people organising tasks. 
(GNOME do these, and it sounds like a good way to help new people to get
into it:
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/BugDays ).

Any thoughts? If people are interested, I'm happy to organise this, provided
I know that it won't just be me sitting on my own on IRC :-).

Regards,
Philip
-- 
KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
KDE Documentation Online: http://docs.kde.org

 
> > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]