[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: bugs.kde.org (was: Re: konqueror has 1305 unconfirmed bugs)
From:       Carsten Niehaus <cniehaus () gmx ! de>
Date:       2006-08-23 7:34:29
Message-ID: 1156318469.4926.8.camel () helium
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Dienstag, den 22.08.2006, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Dirk Stoecker:
> > Coolo once mentioned autoclosing unconfirmed bugs that was over a
> certain age. 
> > 
> > What happened to that idea?
> 
> Notification is much better. There are some long-standing bugs in the 
> data-base which are also unconfirmed, but nevertheless are still
> valid. 

If you know it is valid you should confirm it. Or do I misunderstand the
meaning of "confirmed" (or "new) in bugs.kde.org?

Carsten

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]