[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] std::numeric_limits<double>::min() question.
From: Dmitry Suzdalev <dimsuz () gmail ! com>
Date: 2006-04-26 20:27:14
Message-ID: 200604270027.14854.dimsuz () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thursday 27 April 2006 00:12, Will Entriken wrote:
> std::numeric_limits<double>::min() return the minimum positive value.
Hmm... yes? :)
Bahhh, I should read docs more carefully, thanks! :)
> you could try maxd = -1 if d will be non-negative. that will be pretty
> obvious what is going on.
Nope, d might be negative - that's why I didn't use -1 for maxd.
So, then another question:
Maybe I'm wrong when I say that
"-std::numeric_limits<double>::max()" is messy-looking?
Now that I know (thanks, Will), that min() return minimum _positive_ value, I
think that using -max() is all right. Is this so?
Thanks!
Dmitry.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic