On Thursday 27 April 2006 00:12, Will Entriken wrote:
> std::numeric_limits<double>::min() return the minimum positive value.
Hmm... yes? :)
Bahhh, I should read docs more carefully, thanks! :)

> you could try maxd = -1 if d will be non-negative. that will be pretty
> obvious what is going on.
Nope, d might be negative - that's why I didn't use -1 for maxd.
So, then another question:
Maybe I'm wrong when I say that
"-std::numeric_limits<double>::max()" is messy-looking?

Now that I know (thanks, Will), that min() return minimum _positive_ value, I 
think that using -max() is all right. Is this so?

Thanks!
Dmitry.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<