[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE4: Arthur (and?/)or libart2? or kcanvas?
From:       Melchior FRANZ <mfranz () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-06-07 13:49:05
Message-ID: 200506071549.05952 () pflug2 ! gphy ! univie ! ac ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

* Lars Knoll -- Monday 06 June 2005 10:35:
> If you paint onto a QImage (Qt4 supports that now), Qt should not be a lot 
> slower (or have any worse quality) than agg2.

Now I've half-way ported kclock.kss to Qt4. (Not yet painting to a QImage).
And it was very enjoyable. The result is very good so far. Lines seem to be
as good as agg2's. The ellipse seems a tiny bit worse. I have to play more
with it. Maybe I didn't use the best method to draw a filled disc.

The interface is almost *too* simple! Makes the program look totally trivial.
OK, it *is* trivial. But with the libart stuff it did at least *look* like
rocket science.  ;-)

m.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]