[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Desktop Usability Survey
From:       "C.M.Lotion" <cmlotion () wanadoo ! nl>
Date:       2005-03-28 18:27:51
Message-ID: 200503281327.55117.cmlotion () wanadoo ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 28 March 2005 11:49, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2005 18:31, C.M.Lotion wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 March 2005 15:29, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > > On Monday 28 March 2005 00:08, Christoph wrote:
> > > > I was thinking it might be spam when I had to approve it.  What to do
> > > > next time ? Reject Mails with such a To: header ?
> > >
> > > No. its not spam, so there is no reason to reject it.
> >
> > If they need to cross-post to the separate KDE lists, what about sending
> > BCCs or using an alias like kde-all for which you need to file a request?
>
> Clearly there is a need for a survey of what KDE developers think of
> surveys
>
> :)
>
:)
 
> I filled in the forms and sent them off, but I really can't see anything
> useful coming out of it. I didn't really understand a lot of the questions
> such as the "give the user a locus of control. give dialogs closure."
> example given by Adriaan.
>
> -- Richard
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<
Same here. Perhap they could also consider the usability of the survey form. 
The black text on such a blue blackground is not very comfortable to read.

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]