[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: autorun?!
From:       Martin Koller <m.koller () surfeu ! at>
Date:       2003-08-24 9:39:14
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 24 August 2003 04:24, Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Saturday 23 August 2003 07:06, Troels Tolstrup wrote:
> > IMO good defaults are very important, and i don't really think
> > kpersonlizer should influence those very much.
>
> Good defaults ARE very important.  The definition of "good" is up for
> discussion in this case. :)  Either way, there should be a configuration
> option for that sort of thing in the Control Center, but I still think it
> would be better to have it on by default for the Windows-style but not for
> KDE-style.  Perhaps a better option would be to have autoplay enabled only
> if the automounter is also.  I wouldn't know how to check for that though,
> and it would probably be a platform-dependent solution anyways.

I think that a usability option has nothing to do with a graphical style.
You don't change the behaviour of other apps in KDE when a different graphical 
style is selected, do you?

And what is the problem by showing the user an autorun-dialog by default, but 
giving him a checkbox in it, to not do this in the future anymore, as what is 
done by a lot of other dialogs regardless of the graphical style?

- -- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin

Public key at:
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8DFB0F86
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/SIfGHmdPoI37D4YRAidgAJ4kossxqLmTxKyUh7Jg5s7ks1Kv/wCfTChS
XigjKW3fXuAkxAkL6p8ITOc=
=mOlv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]