[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: KDE & ACLs
From: "Manuel Amador \(Rudd-O\)" <amadorm () usm ! edu ! ec>
Date: 2001-11-14 16:45:22
[Download RAW message or body]
This is exactly what I have been looking for.
For now, my small installations don't need ACLs, but for big customers
(with big pockets) I really need ACLs. Kludging around with standard
UNIX permissions and umasks does not suffice. Does anyone know if GNU
tar support the ACL extensions? Does also anyone know if (at least
Linux from) any UNIX supports inheriting ACLs in directories (i.e. I set
a 'bit' on a directory, and all created files into that directory get
the same standard UNIX permissions and ACLs of the directory - minus the
execution bits naturally). This has also come to Windows XP and it's
very needed in our world. Merely chmod g+s and umask 007 is not okay if
you are using ACLs to grant a group read permission to all files in a
directory.
Please 'reply to all'. Thanks
For now try to begin the transition with StarOffice for windows. Once
they get used to it, the introduction of KDE into their desktops (and
brains) will be extremely easy. My clients are very happy (and amazed)
with KDE. Especially the fact that they get to use their old 486s as
terminals. Computers in my country are expensive (or is it that people
here are poor?).
Thanks again.
Dirk Mueller wrote:
>On Die, 13 Nov 2001, Edoardo Causarano wrote:
>
>>I installed an ACL enabled 2.4.14 kernel for use in a samba controlled NT
>>domain. In the near future I'd like to zap NT and migrate my users to KDE &
>>Star Office (actually some of them are even *ASKING* me to start the
>>migration!) Thus I'm wondering if anyone one of you is implementing ACL in
>>the file/properties/authorization tab of Konqui
>>
>
>Which variant of the numerous ACL APIs are you using ?
>
>
>Dirk
>
>
>>>Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
>>>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
This is exactly what I have been looking for.<br>
<br>
For now, my small installations don't need ACLs, but for big customers (with
big pockets) I really need ACLs. Kludging around with standard UNIX permissions
and umasks does not suffice. Does anyone know if GNU tar support the ACL
extensions? Does also anyone know if (at least Linux from) any UNIX supports
inheriting ACLs in directories (i.e. I set a 'bit' on a directory, and all
created files into that directory get the same standard UNIX permissions
and ACLs of the directory - minus the execution bits naturally). This has
also come to Windows XP and it's very needed in our world. Merely chmod
g+s and umask 007 is not okay if you are using ACLs to grant a group read
permission to all files in a directory.<br>
<br>
Please 'reply to all'. Thanks<br>
<br>
For now try to begin the transition with StarOffice for windows. Once they
get used to it, the introduction of KDE into their desktops (and brains)
will be extremely easy. My clients are very happy (and amazed) with KDE.
Especially the fact that they get to use their old 486s as terminals. \
Computers in my country are expensive (or is it that people here are \
poor?).<br> <br>
Thanks again.<br>
<br>
Dirk Mueller wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:20011113135729.A13131@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de">
<pre wrap="">On Die, 13 Nov 2001, Edoardo Causarano wrote:<br><br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I installed an ACL enabled 2.4.14 kernel for use in a samba \
controlled NT <br>domain. In the near future I'd like to zap NT and migrate my users \
to KDE & <br>Star Office (actually some of them are even *ASKING* me to start the \
<br>migration!) Thus I'm wondering if anyone one of you is implementing ACL in \
<br>the file/properties/authorization tab of Konqui<br></pre> </blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----><br>Which variant of the numerous ACL APIs are you using \
?<br><br><br>Dirk<br> <br></pre> <blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Visit <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub">http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub</a> \
to unsubscribe <<<br></pre> </blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic