[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Porting convention
From:       Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date:       2001-08-27 12:42:58
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 26 August 2001 12:37, Joseph Wenninger wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I wouldn't want to clutter other's sources with tons of #ifdefs if
> > I'm the only one who prefers directly going for QT_NO_COMPAT :-]
> >
> > - Frerich
>
> I think the general opinion at the moment is to port without
> QT_NO_COMPAT/.... .
<snip>

But at least the header files should compile under QT_NO_COMPAT, 
QT_NO_ASCII_CAST and QT_NO_CAST_ASCII, to let the app developers the 
freedom of choice.

Marc

- -- 
"You're hackers, aren't you," the barman said, eyeing us. No one said
a thing. The darkness of the Eurotunnel rolled by. Apparently we'd
given ourselves away by talking too enthusiastically about IPv6. He
looked around conspiratorially, lowered his voice. "Can you get me
some credit card numbers?"
      -- James J. King "What's the shortest way to hack a Linux box?"
         Telepolis 2001/08/11 (#9293)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7ilwk3oWD+L2/6DgRAnbBAKDp4uHX6RxBAECjpq8X88U19EMzuACfekLo
1eYBojgOULLWsW90Nhg3w6s=
=V2Qc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]