[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Can we fix KSpell in KDE_2_0_BRANCH ?
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-11-01 3:27:44
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:02:19AM +0100, Matthias Kiefer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Wolfram Diestel and I  has fixed numerous bugs in kspell
> (to be honest: almost everything has been fixed by Wolfram).
> KSpell was _very_ buggy. Some functions like checkList() haven't 
> worked at all. 
> 
> So I would like to ask, if we are allowed to fix kspell in
> KDE_2_0_BRANCH. I think, since these were really grave bugs, 
> a fixed version should be available as soon as possible.
> 
> Here is a list of what has been fixed:
> 
> - spellcheck with dictionaries using charsets Latin1, Latin2, Latin3,
>    UTF8
> - checking lines longer than 150 chars (now up to 10.000 chars possible)
> - checkList _finally_ works (necessary for checking marked-up documents)
> - accept the ispell responses + (root) and - (compound) too
> - more robustness against strange words like "%1"
> - some corrections in the config dialog 
> 
> I have attached a patch for review, but you can also have a look at the 
> kspell sources in HEAD, where the fixed version is already in.
> 
> So please let me know, if it is ok to commit.

I would say it is (ok to commit).

-- 
David FAURE
david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://home.clara.net/faure/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]