[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: Life beyond 2.0
From:       Antonio Larrosa <antonio () larrosa ! org>
Date:       2000-08-27 23:15:21
[Download RAW message or body]

Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> Antonio Larrosa wrote:
> >
> > Alex Zepeda wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 01:18:55AM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> > >
> > > > This sounds good to me - although people will look for inexisting
> > > > packages, like kdenetwork-2.1 which may not exist if only e.g. kdelibs
> > > > kdebase and kdeutils were released as part of 2.1.
> > > > So they have to mix kdenetwork-2.0 with kdelibs-2.1, kdebase-2.1 etc...
> > > > But why not.
> > >
> > > Then perhaps a new version should be released changes or no.  This way the
> > > version number will be consistant.
> > >
> >
> > IMHO the proposal will make things much more complicated for users
> > unless we do as Alex says, and we release _every_ package each time.
> >
> > But then, what is the benefit of this proposal ?
> >
> > Are we really going to stop releasing an improved kdenetwork because it
> > doesn't have a complete translation ? I don't think this is the way to
> > go.
> >
> > We release code, translators release translations. Otoh, we sometimes
> I'm afraid our definitions of 'we' differ very much in this context
> 

Well, I use to include translators when I say "we" meaning the KDE project
(they're part of the project anyway as much as you or me) but this time
I was talking just about the developers as we're on kde-core-_devel_ .
Perhaps I should have said "developers" instead of "we", but I thought
that "we" (as in "the people from this list") are all developers.

Sorry if any translator felt "excluded" because of my comment, which
wasn't my intention at all.

Greetings,

--
Antonio Larrosa Jimenez
KDE Core developer
antlarr@arrakis.es        larrosa@kde.org
http://www.arrakis.es/~rlarrosa
KDE - The development framework of the future, today.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]