[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: RFC: Life beyond 2.0
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2000-08-27 22:29:31
[Download RAW message or body]

Antonio Larrosa wrote:
> 
> Alex Zepeda wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 01:18:55AM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> >
> > > This sounds good to me - although people will look for inexisting
> > > packages, like kdenetwork-2.1 which may not exist if only e.g. kdelibs
> > > kdebase and kdeutils were released as part of 2.1.
> > > So they have to mix kdenetwork-2.0 with kdelibs-2.1, kdebase-2.1 etc...
> > > But why not.
> >
> > Then perhaps a new version should be released changes or no.  This way the
> > version number will be consistant.
> >
> 
> IMHO the proposal will make things much more complicated for users
> unless we do as Alex says, and we release _every_ package each time.
> 
> But then, what is the benefit of this proposal ?
> 
> Are we really going to stop releasing an improved kdenetwork because it
> doesn't have a complete translation ? I don't think this is the way to
> go.
> 
> We release code, translators release translations. Otoh, we sometimes
I'm afraid our definitions of 'we' differ very much in this context

Greetings, Stephan

> release bugs and translators release untranslated strings. That's life,
> and I don't think we should stop releasing a package just because there
> are missing translations (except for "important" releases like
> 2.0 or 2.1)
> 

-- 
... but you ain't had mine

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]