[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Proposal: replace KDOC with Doxygen after 2.0
From:       Thomas Capricelli <capricel () yalbi ! com>
Date:       2000-08-24 13:56:27
[Download RAW message or body]




	As nobody seems to have answered to this, let me say I fully agree
	with Peter.
	My company is using Doxygen for its own code documentation. It's really
	well done.

Thomas


On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Peter Putzer wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Please have a look at
>
>http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
>
>Doxygen is a nice documentation tool written in C++ (with Qt) that
>supports a superset of the kdoc/javadoc syntax (as well as a more
>LaTeX-like one). It's free software available under the GNU GPL.
>
>Currently it supports C++, C, CORBA- and M$-IDL, so it shouldn't be to
>hard to extend it to include support for DCOP-IDL.
>
>The author is very active and releases improved versions every few weeks.
>
>IMNSHO we should replace kdoc (which - being written in Perl - has
>remained a hack, a very nice hack, but a hack nonetheless) with doxygen
>ASAP. It supports far more C++ features (and of course Qt signals and
>slots) and can generate HTML, man-pages, LaTeX, RTF and PDF.
>
>Please let's not fall into the "Not Invented Here" syndrome by not using a
>clearly superior tool just because "we've got our own".
>
>I'd volunteer to write a conversion script to fix the small discrepancies
>in syntax that'll show up when converting large amounts of documentation
>after 2.0 is released.
>
>regards,
>Peter
-- 

Thomas Capricelli <capricel@yalbi.com>
Yalbi - Sales Manager - www.yalbi.com
TEL : +33 1 45 81 81 59
GSM : +33 6 13 02 05 21

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]