[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Warning: changes in khtml
From:       Torben Weis <weis () stud ! uni-frankfurt ! de>
Date:       1999-11-29 4:26:19
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Reginald Stadlbauer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> >David Faure wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 01:32:55PM -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> >> > Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >> > > That's why we decided to leave things as is (not to break stuff for
> >> > > Krash) and finish the port of khtmlwidget to become a full fledged
> >> > > BrowserView after Krash.
> >> > 
> >> > By 'BrowserView', I hope you are referring to KParts?
> >> Not yet.
> >> The current BrowserView is what allows to embed in konqueror.
> >> Currently it's not related to KParts,
> >
> >Yes, I know :-)
> >
> >> but the KParts beind developed in kdenonbeta (a less-koffice-specific
> >> KParts) will allows BrowserView to be based on it.
> >
> >Okay.. now Simon was referring to *after* KRASH.  It was my assumption
> >that Konqueror would be based on KParts... hence my question.
> >
> >So let's say that it is now after KRASH and BrowserView now uses
> >KParts as the back-end.  A few questions:
> >
> >1) Will the BrowserView API change at all?  That is, will current
> >   BrowserView parts have to be rewritten?
> >
> >2) Will apps OTHER than Konqueror be able to embed the BrowserView
> >   parts?  For instance, will my MyCoolApp be able to embed a
> >   kghostview part?  Or will BrowserView still be very specific to
> >   Konqueror?
> 
> While speaking about that - will it be possible then to embed kghostview inot a
> KOffice part - that would be cool!!!!!!

No.

Bye
Torben
 
> -- 
> Reggie

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]