[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: sentry evaluation
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date: 2023-06-04 22:20:09
Message-ID: 1687304.1vFDZNPIbW () xps15
[Download RAW message or body]
El dijous, 1 de juny de 2023, a les 12:35:41 (CEST), Harald Sitter va
escriure:
> Hey,
>
> We've had almost a year, albeit in a super limited capacity for git
> builds, with sentry (https://errors-eval.kde.org) and we should
> probably render a final verdict on the evaluation.
>
> Did you like it?
Did I miss the email announcing this?
I can only see a "Towards Excellent Defect Management" sent 2 years ago that
describes a plan, but i can't see any kind of "You can join sentry to do this
and that".
By clicking on https://errors-eval.kde.org i can't really seem to see anything
to evaluate either, all it deos is it asks me to join a team.
Cheers,
Albert
> What could be improved?
> Should we move ahead with a more permanent setup?
>
> The overall game plan would be to have drkonqi ask the user to opt
> into automatic crash submission when they open drkonqi so we get close
> to all crashes (the ones caught by kcrash) automatically filed into
> sentry from then on out. To increase exposure of this feature I'd also
> like to glue it into the feedback KCM but I'm not yet sure if it
> should be a separate setting or linked to the regular feedback
> categories, the former sounds more accessible. The current bugzilla
> based workflow would still be available for when the user actually
> wants to write a description.
>
> (previous discussion: https://markmail.org/thread/6y5paczdposz3aoj)
>
> HS
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic