[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Koko in KDEReview
From:       Ben Cooksley <bcooksley () kde ! org>
Date:       2021-05-04 19:13:51
Message-ID: CA+XidOFKWjF9_Kx1o5kAW7acqiuypCErX_bb8kw1E0cNQXSHbA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 5 May 2021, 7:02 am Nate Graham, <nate@kde.org> wrote:

> On 5/4/21 12:57 PM, Alexander Semke wrote:
> > Jira can do all of this, except of the tight integration with GitLab out
> of
> > the box maybe, and even more. I'm heavily using Jira at work on the
> daily base
> > and it's a very reliable and feature-rich tool for project management and
> > issue tracking. Many open source communities are using Jira, also Qt.
> >
> > If we try to have an open mind and are also ok with closed source
> software
> > that is offering its service for open source projects, should we
> consider Jira
> > as well?
> >
> > https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request
>
> I don't think we can consider that kind of thing, or else we would be
> using GitLab EE (which is offered for free to FOSS projects) rather than
> GitLab CE.
>

Nate is correct here, as a matter of policy we only run software that is
FOSS.


> FWIW I used Jira a lot professionally before my KDE days and am not a
> big fan of it. My experience with it was that it was slow, confusing,
> buggy, and ate my text a lot. Maybe it's better now, I dunno.
>
> Nate
>

Cheers,
Ben

>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On \
Wed, 5 May 2021, 7:02 am Nate Graham, &lt;<a \
href="mailto:nate@kde.org">nate@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">On 5/4/21 12:57 PM, Alexander Semke wrote:<br> &gt; Jira can \
do all of this, except of the tight integration with GitLab out of<br> &gt; the box \
maybe, and even more. I&#39;m heavily using Jira at work on the daily base<br> &gt; \
and it&#39;s a very reliable and feature-rich tool for project management and<br> \
&gt; issue tracking. Many open source communities are using Jira, also Qt.<br> &gt; \
<br> &gt; If we try to have an open mind and are also ok with closed source \
software<br> &gt; that is offering its service for open source projects, should we \
consider Jira<br> &gt; as well?<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; <a href="https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request" \
rel="noreferrer noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request</a><br>
 <br>
I don&#39;t think we can consider that kind of thing, or else we would be <br>
using GitLab EE (which is offered for free to FOSS projects) rather than <br>
GitLab CE.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Nate \
is correct here, as a matter of policy we only run software that is FOSS.  </div><div \
dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
FWIW I used Jira a lot professionally before my KDE days and am not a <br>
big fan of it. My experience with it was that it was slow, confusing, <br>
buggy, and ate my text a lot. Maybe it&#39;s better now, I dunno.<br>
<br>
Nate<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers,  \
</div><div dir="auto">Ben</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> </blockquote></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]