[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submit
From:       Dominik Haumann <dhaumann () kde ! org>
Date:       2019-12-30 8:55:16
Message-ID: CALi_srBu+W99wm2ksiZFsiabGJb-S6OKpCbpyNLwDi7p8EacpQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:

>
> On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which
> > everyone including you considered not that satisfying?
>
> Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6
> (which will open in a few months).
>
>
> Generally, getting Grantlee into KF5 now also establishes the wrong
> precedent. Grantlee should be split into two repos each with a tier 1
> library (KF6::TextDocument and KF6::TextTemplate). The two are
> independent and have nothing to do with each other aside from
> authorship. That seems to be something you were objecting to, so I want
> to make sure that's something addressed on its own. The two KF6
> libraries will then follow the KF6 naming conventions etc.
>

With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to
QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?

Before starting this work, let's clarify whether we can find a more unique
name (like KF6:GrantleeTextDocument).

Since I haven't used Grantlee yet, I sm likely not the best person to find
a better name ;)

Best regards
Dominik

>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="auto"><div>Hi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">Stephen Kelly &lt;<a \
href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com">steveire@gmail.com</a>&gt; schrieb am So., 29. Dez. \
2019, 15:03:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br> On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich \
W. H. Kossebau wrote:<br> &gt; Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the \
old state, which<br> &gt; everyone including you considered not that satisfying?<br>
<br>
Because it&#39;s a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6 <br>
(which will open in a few months).<br>
<br>
<br>
Generally, getting Grantlee into KF5 now also establishes the wrong <br>
precedent. Grantlee should be split into two repos each with a tier 1 <br>
library (KF6::TextDocument and KF6::TextTemplate). The two are <br>
independent and have nothing to do with each other aside from <br>
authorship. That seems to be something you were objecting to, so I want <br>
to make sure that&#39;s something addressed on its own. The two KF6 <br>
libraries will then follow the KF6 naming conventions \
etc.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">With my \
KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to QTextDocument or \
KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto">Before starting this work, let&#39;s clarify whether we can find a more \
unique name (like KF6:GrantleeTextDocument).</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div \
dir="auto">Since I haven&#39;t used Grantlee yet, I sm likely not the best person to \
find a better name ;)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best \
regards</div><div dir="auto">Dominik</div><div dir="auto"><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> </blockquote></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]